DOTScreener Blog
Compliance updates, legal analysis, and operational guides for freight brokers and shippers choosing carriers after Montgomery.
313 articles · RSS feed
You hired a broker, the broker booked a carrier, and a truck with a different name on the door just backed into your dock. Here's how shippers can tell when a load has been double brokered, what to check before you load, and how to get proof of the truck in front of you.
In a fictitious pickup, a thief shows up at your dock posing as the carrier your broker booked, with the right pickup number and a convincing story, and drives away with the load. Here's how shippers stop it before the doors close.
Double brokering isn't named as its own violation in federal law, but re-brokering a load without broker authority is unlawful brokerage under 49 U.S.C. § 14916. Here's what the statute says, how FMCSA's 2023 guidance on dispatchers fits in, and what that means for the load in front of you.
Verifying every truck on every load sounds great until your dispatch floor is busy. Here's a written, risk-based policy for when your team must send a Verifi check before pickup, the triggers that should make it mandatory, and the exact wording you can paste into your carrier-selection SOP.
Your shippers are scared of double brokering too. Brokers who send verified photos of the truck, its GPS location and the driver's number to the shipper at pickup don't just prevent fraud. They win and keep accounts. Here's how to make proof of pickup part of your service.
Most carrier vetting tools can tell you a carrier looked fine. Far fewer can prove what you saw on the day you tendered the load. Here's what to demand from vetting software after Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, the questions to ask on every demo, and how Highway, RMIS, Carrier Assure and DOTScreener line up.
Most brokers think a carrier packet is about collecting paperwork. After Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, it's actually about proving when you collected it — and whether the documents were current on the day you tendered. Here's what a real carrier onboarding record looks like, and why ad-hoc document collection falls apart the moment a plaintiff's attorney gets a subpoena.
A low out-of-service rate doesn't mean a carrier has a functional maintenance program. After Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, plaintiffs' attorneys know to subpoena inspection records and look for patterns in 49 CFR § 396.3 violations — and most brokers have no idea what that citation even means.
The Vehicle Maintenance BASIC is a scorecard for how seriously a carrier takes pre-trip inspections — and after Montgomery, a broker who tendered to a carrier with documented brake violations without checking that percentile has a serious problem explaining it in court.
The filing that makes a carrier's insurance look active in SAFER isn't the same thing as insurance that pays. Here's what BMC-91 vs BMC-91X actually tells you — and what it doesn't.
FMCSA moved carrier registration to its Motus system in May 2026 and started issuing randomized 8+ digit MC numbers that legacy lookup tools—including SAFER's MC search—can't resolve. Here's what that means for your vetting process and your paper trail.
After Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, a broker's carrier file is only as good as the timestamp on its records. Here's what plaintiff's lawyers are actually looking for — and what a file that holds up actually looks like.
A carrier can sit above FMCSA's intervention threshold for months before anyone investigates them. That doesn't make them safe to book — it means you're the one doing the monitoring until FMCSA gets there.
A one-time SAFER pull is a photograph, not a film — and plaintiffs' attorneys know how to find the frames you missed. Here's what insurance lapses look like in discovery and why a single check-at-booking isn't enough anymore.
A 'Not Rated' carrier has never been audited by FMCSA — that's not the same as a clean record. Most brokers have this backwards, and after Montgomery, that mistake has a price.
After Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, every carrier file you build is also a defense exhibit. Here's the exact order in which plaintiff's counsel reconstructs your diligence — and the four things that sink brokers before the case even reaches discovery.
Most brokers treat the MCS-90 endorsement as proof a carrier's freight is covered. It isn't. The MCS-90 protects the public from an uninsured motor carrier — your shipper's $280K load of electronics is a completely different conversation.
DOTScreener shows you a carrier's COI even when you didn't request it — collected by another broker in the network. That's useful. It's not the same as verifying the policy is active right now, and confusing the two is exactly the kind of gap that shows up in discovery.
Some carriers shed a bad safety record the same way a snake sheds skin — file new authority, new MC number, same trucks and same drivers. Here's how to catch the pattern before your load moves.
FMCSA's Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse has been live since 2020, but most brokers have never worked it into their carrier vetting. After Montgomery, not asking is a liability gap you don't want sitting in your file.
Brokers confuse FMCSA out-of-service rates with out-of-service orders constantly — and they're not remotely the same thing. One is history. The other is current legal status. Post-Montgomery, mixing them up is not a minor paperwork gap.
Most carriers never check a broker's authority, bond, or payment history before moving a load. After Montgomery, that's not just a cash-flow problem — it's a compliance and liability exposure too. Here's what to look at before you hook up.
The ACORD 25 is a summary, not a policy. Most brokers treat it like proof of coverage and file it. Here's what actually to read, what to verify, and what a certificate can't tell you — before a carrier's insurer denies a claim you thought was covered.
FMCSA publishes a specific percentile at which they start prioritizing a carrier for enforcement. Most brokers have never read the number. Plaintiff's counsel has. When your carrier's HOS BASIC sits above the government's own intervention threshold and your file shows you saw it, the negligent-selection case gets a lot shorter.
Standard SAFER vetting won't catch the cargo insurance exclusion, equipment maintenance gap, or driver training blind spots that cause most reefer spoilage claims. Here's what I actually check before tendering a temp-controlled load.